[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201601112033.11487.marex@denx.de>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 20:33:11 +0100
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc: kbuild-all@...org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@...gutronix.de>,
Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] net: can: ifi: Add IFI CANFD IP support
On Monday, January 11, 2016 at 08:29:28 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi Marek,
Hi Robot,
> [auto build test WARNING on net/master]
> [also build test WARNING on v4.4 next-20160111]
> [if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to
> help improving the system]
>
> url:
> https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Marek-Vasut/net-can-Sort-the-Kcon
> fig-includes/20160112-025020 config: x86_64-allmodconfig (attached as
> .config)
> reproduce:
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> make ARCH=x86_64
>
> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> drivers/net/can/ifi_canfd/ifi_canfd.c: In function 'ifi_canfd_isr':
> >> drivers/net/can/ifi_canfd/ifi_canfd.c:486:27: warning: large integer
> >> implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Woverflow]
>
> const u32 clr_irq_mask = ~(IFI_CANFD_INTERRUPT_SET_IRQ |
> ^
> drivers/net/can/ifi_canfd/ifi_canfd.c: In function 'ifi_canfd_start':
> drivers/net/can/ifi_canfd/ifi_canfd.c:640:9: warning: large integer
> implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Woverflow]
> writel(~IFI_CANFD_INTERRUPT_SET_IRQ, priv->base + IFI_CANFD_INTERRUPT); ^
> drivers/net/can/ifi_canfd/ifi_canfd.c: In function 'ifi_canfd_stop':
> drivers/net/can/ifi_canfd/ifi_canfd.c:675:9: warning: large integer
> implicitly truncated to unsigned type [-Woverflow]
> writel(~IFI_CANFD_INTERRUPT_SET_IRQ, priv->base + IFI_CANFD_INTERRUPT); ^
How did this splat came to be ? I would expect that the expansion goes like
this:
const u32 clr_irq_mask = ~(IFI_CANFD_INTERRUPT_SET_IRQ |
IFI_CANFD_INTERRUPT_ERROR_WARNING);
const u32 clr_irq_mask = ~(BIT(31) | BIT(1));
const u32 clr_irq_mask = ~(0x80000002);
const u32 clr_irq_mask = 0x7ffffffd;
Did I miss something there ?
Thanks!
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
Powered by blists - more mailing lists