lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160111.163125.1974780181651011339.davem@davemloft.net>
Date:	Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:31:25 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	vyasevich@...il.com
Cc:	mleitner@...hat.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
	lucien.xin@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, vyasevic@...hat.com,
	daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] sctp: add the rhashtable apis for sctp
 global transport hashtable

From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 12:20:17 -0500

> I have a hard time excepting this argument.  Just because a given test
> scenario may be unreasonable now, doesn't make so in the future.  If
> there is a way to solve the problem, then it should be done.  Saying
> this isn't really a problem isn't going to make it go away.

+1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ