[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160111.163125.1974780181651011339.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 16:31:25 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: vyasevich@...il.com
Cc: mleitner@...hat.com, herbert@...dor.apana.org.au,
lucien.xin@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org, vyasevic@...hat.com,
daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/5] sctp: add the rhashtable apis for sctp
global transport hashtable
From: Vlad Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2016 12:20:17 -0500
> I have a hard time excepting this argument. Just because a given test
> scenario may be unreasonable now, doesn't make so in the future. If
> there is a way to solve the problem, then it should be done. Saying
> this isn't really a problem isn't going to make it go away.
+1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists