netdev - Re: Q: bad routing table cache entries

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 12 Jan 2016 20:41:14 +0300
From:	Stas Sergeev <stsp@...t.ru>
To:	Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>
Cc:	netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: Q: bad routing table cache entries

12.01.2016 20:26, Hannes Frederic Sowa пишет:
> If it would be 0 the rfc1812 applies and
> should stop servers to send such redirects and clients to accept those.
Well, this is a very interesting point that
contradicts with all assumptions of the prev thread.
The assumptions were based on this document:
https://www.frozentux.net/ipsysctl-tutorial/chunkyhtml/theconfvariables.html
which says:
---
The shared_media setting tells the kernel if the physical network connected to a specific network card is a shared media or not. For example, if several different IP networks with different netmasks
operate over the same physical media or not.
*The main effect that this variable makes, is to tell the kernel whether it should send ICMP redirects to specific networks or not.*
---

But you seem to be saying that rfc1812 applies when it
is _disabled_ so the  ICMP redirects should still be sent,
just with the different rules.
So can you confirm that you imply the above document is wrong?