[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87bn8qv5m4.fsf@nemi.mork.no>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 22:40:35 +0100
From: Bjørn Mork <bjorn@...k.no>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: lkundrak@...sk, jay.vosburgh@...onical.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, vfalico@...il.com,
gospo@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] bonding: make device count build-time configurable
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> writes:
> From: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>
> Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2016 18:19:49 +0100
>
>> It's still an improvement to let the distributions decide if they're
>> keeping "ip link add" broken or possibly affecting the scripts.
>
> That it is "broken" is your opinion.
>
> Document the behavior. It is not broken if the user is told to be
> mindful of what devices are created by default.
>
> There is way too much downside to changing this.
Besides, distributions or admins can already change that behaviour if
they consider it "broken", using the existing module parameter:
# echo "options bonding max_bonds=0" >/etc/modprobe.d/bonding.conf
# rmmod bonding
# ip link add bond0 type bond
(no error here)
This method should be well known and understood by most users, contrary
to some odd CONFIG_ build time setting.
Bjørn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists