netdev - Re: [PATCH net] openvswitch: compute needed headroom for internal vports

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1452706218.28238.2.camel@redhat.com>
Date:	Wed, 13 Jan 2016 18:30:18 +0100
From:	Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
To:	pravin shelar <pshelar@....org>
Cc:	Jesse Gross <jesse@...nel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pravin Shelar <pshelar@...ira.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Flavio Leitner <fbl@...close.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] openvswitch: compute needed headroom for internal
 vports

On Tue, 2016-01-12 at 21:27 -0800, pravin shelar wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Jesse Gross <jesse@...nel.org> wrote:
> > Any traffic coming from the hypervisor itself (as well as tunnels
> > although unless you are doing double encapsulation then this patch
> > doesn't matter in that case).
> >
> 
> ok, But majority of traffic comes from VM. So IMO only this patch
> would not make much difference.
> 
> > Since we're in the merge window now, maybe it makes sense to just go
> > for the full version in the next cycle in any case.
> 
> ok.

Thank you for the feedback.

I'll try to implement a more general solution and get some performance
numbers for the next cycle,

Paolo