netdev - Re: fsl/fman: Clarification for implementation details in dtsec

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160113220923.GE5527@lunn.ch>
Date:	Wed, 13 Jan 2016 23:09:23 +0100
From:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Igal Liberman <igal.liberman@...escale.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
Subject: Re: fsl/fman: Clarification for implementation details in
 dtsec_config()

On Thu, Jan 14, 2016 at 12:35:37AM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> I think you can remove the put_device() line.

Agreed.

of_phy_find_device() only does a get_device() when it finds a matching
device.

	Andrew