lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 13 Jan 2016 23:56:43 -0500 (EST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	haiyangz@...rosoft.com
Cc:	vkuznets@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, kys@...rosoft.com,
	devel@...uxdriverproject.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] hv_netvsc: don't make assumptions on struct
 flow_keys layout

From: Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@...rosoft.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 23:10:57 +0000

> I have done a comparison of the Toeplitz v.s. Jenkins Hash algorithms, 
> and found that the Toeplitz provides much better distribution of the 
> connections into send-indirection-table entries.

This fails to take into consideration how massively more expensive
Toeplitz is to compute.

This also fails to show what the real life performance implications
are.

Just showing distributions is meaningless if it doesn't indicate
what kind of performance distrubtion A or B achieves.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists