lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 15 Jan 2016 23:42:33 +0100
From:	Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>
To:	Sebastian Pöhn <sebastian.poehn@...il.com>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: nf_conntrack_h323: Fix locking in process_urq

Sebastian Pöhn <sebastian.poehn@...il.com> wrote:

[ CC netfilter-devel ]

> nf_ct_remove_expectations has to be called under nf_conntrack_expect_lock

But nf_ct_remove_expectations grabs that lock?

Added in:

commit ca7433df3a672efc88e08222cfa4b3aa965ca324
Author: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
netfilter: conntrack: seperate expect locking from nf_conntrack_lock

> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_h323_main.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_h323_main.c
> index 9511af0..d477375 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_h323_main.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_h323_main.c
> @@ -1518,7 +1518,9 @@ static int process_urq(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nf_conn *ct,
>         }
>  
>         /* Clear old expect */
> +       spin_lock_bh(&nf_conntrack_expect_lock);
>         nf_ct_remove_expectations(ct);

... so I'd expect deadlock.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ