[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <VI1PR04MB16645A2F24DB515D86136BE2E8C00@VI1PR04MB1664.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 07:23:27 +0000
From: Shaohui Xie <shaohui.xie@....com>
To: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"shh.xie@...il.com" <shh.xie@...il.com>
CC: "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Shaohui Xie <Shaohui.Xie@...escale.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/3][v2] net: phy: introduce 1000BASE-KX and 10GBASE-KR
> > If you look at the list of possible values for "phy-mode" you'd see
> > that none of it describes a PHY-to-PHY connection but all are for
> > MAC-to-PHY connections. Also, names above suggest it already: MII is
> > short for media _independent_ interface.
> >
> > I copy Andrew's concerns and think that neither 10000base-kx nor
> > 10gbase-kr belong in the list of phy-mode properties.
>
> I concur with that as well, if the phy connection does not really matter here,
> or does not seem like a good fit, maybe we should have a different property, or
> just define the hardware interface a little differently?
Right, 'phy-mode' is not a good fit for backplanes, how about a new property like
'backplane-mode' or something, like below:
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/phy.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/phy.txt
@@ -33,6 +33,9 @@ Optional Properties:
- broken-turn-around: If set, indicates the PHY device does not correctly
release the turn around line low at the end of a MDIO transaction.
+- backplane-mode: string, operation mode of the backplane PHY;
+ must be "1000base-kx" for 1000BASE-KX, or "10gbase-kr" for 10GBASE-KR.
+
Example:
ethernet-phy@0 {
Thank you!
Shaohui
Powered by blists - more mailing lists