lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:26:29 +0200
From:	Kalle Valo <>
To:	Rafał Miłecki <>
Cc:	Arnd Bergmann <>,
	"linux-mips\" <>,
	Hauke Mehrtens <>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
	Michael Buesch <>,
	Network Development <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RESEND] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused

Rafał Miłecki <> writes:

> On 16 January 2016 at 13:10, Kalle Valo <> wrote:
>> Arnd Bergmann <> writes:
>>> On Thursday 14 January 2016 08:46:29 Kalle Valo wrote:
>>>> I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my
>>>> wireless-drivers trees.
>>> I found this in my backlog, and I believe it still applies. Can you take
>>> that one too?
>> I'm not sure what you mean here, I can take any ssb patch if it's ok for
>> Michael or Rafal :)
>> Just please submit the patch properly (with S-o-B line) and CC
>> linux-wireless so that it goes to patchwork.
> It was already sent once and Acked by Michael:
> The problem was not cc-ing linux-wireless so it wasn't picked by the
> linux-wireless patchwork.

Ah, that's why I missed it. I only follow patchwork, I basically ignore
patches which are sent via email. Arnd, can you please resend the patch
and CC linux-wireless? Sorry for the trouble.

To avoid this in the future I think we should replace netdev with
linux-wireless in the MAINTAINERS entry:

M:      Michael Buesch <>
S:      Maintained
F:      drivers/ssb/
F:      include/linux/ssb/

Are people ok with that? Patches welcome :)

Kalle Valo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists