[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87y4bn5m4q.fsf@kamboji.qca.qualcomm.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 10:26:29 +0200
From: Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
To: Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
"linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-mips\@linux-mips.org" <linux-mips@...ux-mips.org>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Buesch <m@...s.ch>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RESEND] ssb: mark ssb_bus_register as __maybe_unused
Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@...il.com> writes:
> On 16 January 2016 at 13:10, Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>> Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> writes:
>>
>>> On Thursday 14 January 2016 08:46:29 Kalle Valo wrote:
>>>> I can take it. For historical reasons ssb patches go through my
>>>> wireless-drivers trees.
>>>
>>> I found this in my backlog, and I believe it still applies. Can you take
>>> that one too?
>>
>> I'm not sure what you mean here, I can take any ssb patch if it's ok for
>> Michael or Rafal :)
>>
>> Just please submit the patch properly (with S-o-B line) and CC
>> linux-wireless so that it goes to patchwork.
>
> It was already sent once and Acked by Michael:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/7543191/
>
> The problem was not cc-ing linux-wireless so it wasn't picked by the
> linux-wireless patchwork.
Ah, that's why I missed it. I only follow patchwork, I basically ignore
patches which are sent via email. Arnd, can you please resend the patch
and CC linux-wireless? Sorry for the trouble.
To avoid this in the future I think we should replace netdev with
linux-wireless in the MAINTAINERS entry:
SONICS SILICON BACKPLANE DRIVER (SSB)
M: Michael Buesch <m@...s.ch>
L: netdev@...r.kernel.org
S: Maintained
F: drivers/ssb/
F: include/linux/ssb/
Are people ok with that? Patches welcome :)
--
Kalle Valo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists