lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFBinCCnmHLJWoFG+mzE638E7h+Z38i3QW8iH2JhTBoHJVotkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 18 Jan 2016 01:24:04 +0100
From:	Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, f.fainelli@...il.com, daniel@...que.org,
	Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, mans@...sr.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/4] net: phy: at803x: Don't set gbit features for the
 AR8030 phy

On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 1:17 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> Series applied, but this is not the proper way to send a patch series.
Thanks!

> A patch series describes a logically related group of changes, therefore
> you must submit first a "[PATCH 0/N] ..." posting that clearly and fully
> describes what the patch series is doing at a high level, and why.
Noted. I initially did this for v1 but forgot it for v2 - sorry.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ