[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFBinCCnmHLJWoFG+mzE638E7h+Z38i3QW8iH2JhTBoHJVotkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2016 01:24:04 +0100
From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, f.fainelli@...il.com, daniel@...que.org,
Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>, mans@...sr.com
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 1/4] net: phy: at803x: Don't set gbit features for the
AR8030 phy
On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 1:17 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> Series applied, but this is not the proper way to send a patch series.
Thanks!
> A patch series describes a logically related group of changes, therefore
> you must submit first a "[PATCH 0/N] ..." posting that clearly and fully
> describes what the patch series is doing at a high level, and why.
Noted. I initially did this for v1 but forgot it for v2 - sorry.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists