[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201601201525.42143.marex@denx.de>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:25:42 +0100
From: Marek Vasut <marex@...x.de>
To: "Marc Kleine-Budde" <mkl@...gutronix.de>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@...tkopp.net>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@...ndegger.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 5/5] net: can: ifi: Add IFI CANFD IP support
On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 at 03:06:02 PM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> On 01/20/2016 01:58 PM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 20, 2016 at 11:54:21 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> >> On 01/20/2016 11:39 AM, Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> >>>> +/* IFI CANFD private data structure */
> >>>> +struct ifi_canfd_priv {
> >>>> + struct can_priv can; /* must be the first member */
> >>>> + struct napi_struct napi;
> >>>> + struct net_device *ndev;
> >>>> + struct device *device;
> >>>
> >>> Nitpick: This variable is write only, correct? I can fix this while
> >>> applying the patch.
> >>>
> >>>> + void __iomem *base;
> >>>> +};
> >>>
> >>> Otherweise looks good.
> >
> > It's write-only, yeah. What would you propose to change here ?
>
> Remove it completely. :D
Erm, right. I see it now, thanks.
> >> Until compiling:
> >>> drivers/net/can/ifi_canfd/ifi_canfd.c:486:40: warning: cast truncates
> >>> bits from constant value (ffffffff7ffffffd becomes 7ffffffd)
> >>> drivers/net/can/ifi_canfd/ifi_canfd.c:640:9: warning: cast truncates
> >>> bits from constant value (ffffffff7fffffff becomes 7fffffff)
> >>> drivers/net/can/ifi_canfd/ifi_canfd.c:676:9: warning: cast truncates
> >>> bits from constant value (ffffffff7fffffff becomes 7fffffff)
> >>
> >> target is ARMv5 with gcc version 4.9.2, compiled with C=2 using sparse
> >> v0.5.0.
> >
> > It's again the BIT() macro :-/ Do you have any idea how to fix this
> > please ? Doing something like u32 foo = ~BIT(31); triggers this splat
> > and I am running out of ideas how to fix that.
>
> -#define IFI_CANFD_INTERRUPT_SET_IRQ BIT(31)
> +#define IFI_CANFD_INTERRUPT_SET_IRQ ((u32)BIT(31))
I see, so adding u32 also here works. I'm starting to wonder if the BIT
macro is really that nice and if I shouldn't just use (1 << n) as usual.
> ...or change the bit to "30" :D
:-)
I will send V3 in a bit.
Best regards,
Marek Vasut
Powered by blists - more mailing lists