[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <6f06b68f62c89489ec1afea5ba1c328ef51efd10.1453418999.git.daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 00:46:28 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: stephen@...workplumber.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH iproute2 -master] tc, bpf: make sure relo is in relation with map section
Add a test that symbol from relocation entry is actually related
to map section and bail out with an error message if it's not the
case; in relation to [1].
[1] https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=26243
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
---
tc/tc_bpf.c | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tc/tc_bpf.c b/tc/tc_bpf.c
index 219ffa5..3c97cdb 100644
--- a/tc/tc_bpf.c
+++ b/tc/tc_bpf.c
@@ -1336,6 +1336,12 @@ static int bpf_apply_relo_data(struct bpf_elf_ctx *ctx,
if (gelf_getsym(ctx->sym_tab, GELF_R_SYM(relo.r_info), &sym) != &sym)
return -EIO;
+ if (sym.st_shndx != ctx->sec_maps) {
+ fprintf(stderr, "ELF contains non-map related relo data in "
+ "entry %u pointing to section %u! Compiler bug?!\n",
+ relo_ent, sym.st_shndx);
+ return -EIO;
+ }
rmap = sym.st_value / sizeof(struct bpf_elf_map);
if (rmap >= ARRAY_SIZE(ctx->map_fds))
--
1.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists