[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160121122730.6330a84b@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 12:27:30 +0100
From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
To: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Or Gerlitz <gerlitz.or@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <borkmann@...earbox.net>,
Marek Majkowski <marek@...udflare.com>,
Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@...essinduktion.org>,
Florian Westphal <fw@...len.de>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@...el.com>,
Amir Vadai <amirva@...il.com>, brouer@...hat.com
Subject: Re: Optimizing instruction-cache, more packets at each stage
On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:27:38 -0800 Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com> wrote:
> eth_type_trans touches headers
True, the eth_type_trans() call in the driver is a major bottleneck,
because it touch the packet header and happens very early in the driver.
In my experiments, where I extract several packet before calling
napi_gro_receive(), and I also delay calling eth_type_trans(). Most of
my speedup comes from this trick, as the prefetch() now that enough
time.
while ((skb = __skb_dequeue(&rx_skb_list)) != NULL) {
skb->protocol = eth_type_trans(skb, rq->netdev);
napi_gro_receive(cq->napi, skb);
}
What is the HW could provide the info we need in the descriptor?!?
eth_type_trans() does two things:
1) determine skb->protocol
2) setup skb->pkt_type = PACKET_{BROADCAST,MULTICAST,OTHERHOST}
Could the HW descriptor deliver the "proto", or perhaps just some bits
on the most common proto's?
The skb->pkt_type don't need many bits. And I bet the HW already have
the information. The BROADCAST and MULTICAST indication are easy. The
PACKET_OTHERHOST, can be turned around, by instead set a PACKET_HOST
indication, if the eth->h_dest match the devices dev->dev_addr (else a
SW compare is required).
Is that doable in hardware?
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Principal Kernel Engineer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists