[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56A0E561.2030409@osg.samsung.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 07:04:17 -0700
From: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@....samsung.com>
To: Jεan Sacren <sakiwit@...il.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, siva.kallam@...adcom.com
Cc: julia.lawall@...6.fr, shuahkhan@...il.com, bh74.an@...sung.com,
ks.giri@...sung.com, vipul.pandya@...sung.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: question about samsung/sxgbe/sxgbe_xpcs.c
On 01/20/2016 10:10 PM, Jεan Sacren wrote:
> From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 14:36:28 -0500
>>
>> From: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
>> Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2016 19:54:20 +0100 (CET)
>
> [...]
>
>>> I just wondered. I was looking at dependencies between networking files.
>>> This one stands out because nothing is dependenton it, even the files it
>>> is compiled with, and it doesn't contain the usual functions,
>>> register_netdev, etc.
>>
>> Even with that explanation, this is a bogus situation.
>>
>> There are no in-tree callers of this code. It should be removed until there
>> are in-tree users.
>>
>> Nobody can figure out if the interface for this is done properly without seeing
>> the call sites and how they work. It is therefore impossible to review this
>> code and judge it's design.
>>
>> If someone doesn't send me a removal patch, I will remove this code myself.
>
> I have the patch ready.
>
> Do you want me to submit it now during the merge window or wait till
> net-next opens up again?
>
My second attempt to locate the author for a comment
on this before it gets removed. Maybe this code could
be fixed just in case it is important for some product
out there.
I am cc'ing the original author in case he has any
comments.
thanks,
-- Shuah
--
Shuah Khan
Sr. Linux Kernel Developer
Open Source Innovation Group
Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley)
shuahkh@....samsung.com | (970) 217-8978
Powered by blists - more mailing lists