[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1453474315.20378.7.camel@brocade.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 14:51:55 +0000
From: Patrick Ruddy <pruddy@...cade.com>
To: "jiri@...nulli.us" <jiri@...nulli.us>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Stapleton <dstaplet@...cade.com>,
Olufemi Komolafe <okomolaf@...cade.com>,
"Stephen Hemminger" <shemming@...cade.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Netlink messages for multicast HW addr programming
On Thu, 2016-01-21 at 21:04 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 12:47:54PM CET, pruddy@...cade.com wrote:
> >Add RTM_NEWADDR and RTM_DELADDR netlink messages to indicate
> >interest in specific multicast hardware addresses. These messages
> >are sent when addressed are added or deleted from the appropriate
> >interface driver.
> >
> >Signed-off-by: Patrick Ruddy <pruddy@...cade.com>
> >
> >diff --git a/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c b/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c
> >index c0548d2..a0ebadd 100644
> >--- a/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c
> >+++ b/net/core/dev_addr_lists.c
> >@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> > */
> >
> > #include <linux/netdevice.h>
> >+#include <net/netlink.h>
> > #include <linux/rtnetlink.h>
> > #include <linux/export.h>
> > #include <linux/list.h>
> >@@ -661,6 +662,62 @@ out:
> > }
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_mc_add_excl);
> >
> >+static int fill_addr(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev,
> >+ const unsigned char *addr, int type)
> >+{
> >+ struct nlmsghdr *nlh;
> >+ struct ifaddrmsg *ifm;
> >+
> >+ nlh = nlmsg_put(skb, 0, 0, type, sizeof(*ifm), 0);
> >+ if (nlh == NULL)
> >+ return -EMSGSIZE;
> >+
> >+ ifm = nlmsg_data(nlh);
> >+ ifm->ifa_family = AF_UNSPEC;
> >+ ifm->ifa_prefixlen = 0;
> >+ ifm->ifa_flags = IFA_F_PERMANENT;
> >+ ifm->ifa_scope = RT_SCOPE_LINK;
> >+ ifm->ifa_index = dev->ifindex;
> >+ if (nla_put(skb, IFA_ADDRESS, dev->addr_len, addr))
> >+ goto nla_put_failure;
> >+ nlmsg_end(skb, nlh);
>
> How can userspace tell if this is a multicast addr? Also, why not add
> notifications for unicast addrs so we handle both the same?
I am only using this RTM_NEW/DELADDR AF_UNSPEC message for multicast
addresses. I understand that the unicast addresses are notified in the
RTM_NEW/DELLINK.
-pr
Powered by blists - more mailing lists