netdev - Re: Has RFC4821 been implemented?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALx6S361VWtUTASeEkkG3Cm3DaeQRCUfAe8fP3T+BjZqw8GGGQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 22 Jan 2016 11:50:54 -0800
From:	Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
To:	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Has RFC4821 been implemented?

Found it: tcp_mtu_probing

On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com> wrote:
> This came up on in one of the IETF mailing lists in the context that
> PMTUD doesn't really work on the Internet so  PLPMTUD is the way to
> go. Looking at the code I only see inet_csk_update_pmtu called from
> ICMP PTB error. I am missing something?
>
> Thanks,
> Tom