lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 24 Jan 2016 21:20:45 -0800 (PST)
From:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To:	ani@...sta.com
Cc:	netdev@...r.kernel.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
	eric.dumazet@...il.com
Subject: Re: tbl->lock not taken in neigh_lookup() ?

From: Ani Sinha <ani@...sta.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 10:11:15 +0530

> Can I get some insights into this? I am sure I am missing something.

The whole point of RCU locking is that read accesses in the fast paths
(lookups) do not need to take the spinlock.  Proper RCU barriers, RCU
deferred freeing of objects, and other things make it safe.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ