[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56A64114.3010400@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 16:36:52 +0100
From: Arend van Spriel <aspriel@...il.com>
To: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc: Paul Stewart <pstew@...omium.org>,
Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>,
Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@...adcom.com>,
brcm80211-dev-list@...adcom.com, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Hante Meuleman <meuleman@...adcom.com>,
Brett Rudley <brudley@...adcom.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" <frankyl@...adcom.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] brcmfmac: sdio: Increase the default timeouts a bit
On 25-01-16 11:47, Sjoerd Simons wrote:
> On a Radxa Rock2 board with a Ampak AP6335 (Broadcom 4339 core) it seems
> the card responds very quickly most of the time, unfortunately during
> initialisation it sometimes seems to take just a bit over 2 seconds to
> respond.
>
> This results intialization failing with message like:
> brcmf_c_preinit_dcmds: Retreiving cur_etheraddr failed, -52
> brcmf_bus_start: failed: -52
> brcmf_sdio_firmware_callback: dongle is not responding
>
> Increasing the timeout to allow for a bit more headroom allows the
> card to initialize reliably.
I would prefer to know where the 2 second response time comes from.
Could be sdio retuning. Maybe the chromeos people can comment whether
this has been root caused.
There is a mmc patch pending in which retuning procedure can be deferred
by the driver. Using that API may resolve the issue as well and I would
prefer that solution.
> A quick search online after diagnosing/fixing this showed that Google
> has a similar patch in their ChromeOS tree, so this doesn't seem
> specific to the board I'm using.
As the retuning stuff is not in main line I guess we need this fix for
now so...
Acked-by: Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>
> Signed-off-by: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd.simons@...labora.co.uk>
>
> ---
Still would like to know whether it is firmware initialization or some
mmc stack procedure. Any suggestions to debug this are welcome.
Regards,
Arend
---
>
> drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
> index dd66143..75ac4bd 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmfmac/sdio.c
> @@ -45,8 +45,8 @@
> #include "chip.h"
> #include "firmware.h"
>
> -#define DCMD_RESP_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(2000)
> -#define CTL_DONE_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(2000)
> +#define DCMD_RESP_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(2500)
> +#define CTL_DONE_TIMEOUT msecs_to_jiffies(2500)
>
> #ifdef DEBUG
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists