[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160126175353.GG27473@lunn.ch>
Date:	Tue, 26 Jan 2016 18:53:53 +0100
From:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc:	Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@...ia.com>,
	Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [BISECTED] v4.5-rc1 phylib regression
> I hate to bikeshed, but I'm not sure if "generic-mdio" is too...
> generic? Will someone writing a DT be thinking "well, this is a
> generic mdio PHY, I should set it"?  "mdio-device"?
> "generic-nonphy-mdio"? Neither of those seem much better.
How about 'not-a-phy'?
    Andrew
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
