lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1453986059.7627.21.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:	Thu, 28 Jan 2016 05:00:59 -0800
From:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To:	Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
	Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
	Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
	Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
	Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
	Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
	Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/4] net: add rx_unhandled stat counter

On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 01:02 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Outside of that, does this approach look sane? Should I
> bother with touching /proc/net/dev output or not?

Please do not touch /proc/net/dev 

This is legacy stuff and really should not be touched anymore.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ