[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1453986059.7627.21.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 05:00:59 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Jarod Wilson <jarod@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
Jay Vosburgh <j.vosburgh@...il.com>,
Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...il.com>,
Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...ulusnetworks.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/4] net: add rx_unhandled stat counter
On Thu, 2016-01-28 at 01:02 -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> Outside of that, does this approach look sane? Should I
> bother with touching /proc/net/dev output or not?
Please do not touch /proc/net/dev
This is legacy stuff and really should not be touched anymore.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists