[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56AA2186.1090208@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 17:11:18 +0300
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Zhouyi Zhou <zhouzhouyi@...il.com>, eric.dumazet@...il.com,
pablo@...filter.org, kaber@...sh.net, kadlec@...ckhole.kfki.hu,
davem@...emloft.net, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org,
coreteam@...filter.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.or
Cc: Zhouyi Zhou <yizhouzhou@....ac.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] netfilter: h323: avoid potential attack
Hello.
On 1/28/2016 11:59 AM, Zhouyi Zhou wrote:
> Thanks Eric for your review and advice.
>
> I think hackers chould build a malicious h323 packet to overflow
> the pointer p which will panic during the memcpy(addr, p, len)
>
> For example, he may fabricate a very large taddr->ipAddress.ip;
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhouyi Zhou <yizhouzhou@....ac.cn>
> ---
> net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_h323_main.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_h323_main.c b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_h323_main.c
> index 9511af0..ccd08c5 100644
> --- a/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_h323_main.c
> +++ b/net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_h323_main.c
> @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ int (*nat_q931_hook) (struct sk_buff *skb,
>
> static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(nf_h323_lock);
> static char *h323_buffer;
> +#define CHECK_BOUND(p, n) ((void *)p + n - (void *)h323_buffer > 65536)
You have to enclose the macro parameters in parens when used in expression.
MBR, Sergei
Powered by blists - more mailing lists