[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1454096398.7627.63.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 11:39:58 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Kernel unaligned access at __skb_flow_dissect
On Fri, 2016-01-29 at 11:08 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 10:40:10 -0800
>
> > I would try following ixgbe fix (sorry, totally untested, but you get
> > the idea...)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> > index c4003a88bbf6..7ba64ed463a6 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> > @@ -1525,7 +1525,7 @@ static bool ixgbe_alloc_mapped_page(struct ixgbe_ring *rx_ring,
> >
> > bi->dma = dma;
> > bi->page = page;
> > - bi->page_offset = 0;
> > + bi->page_offset = NET_IP_ALIGN;
> >
> > return true;
> > }
>
> Hmmm, wouldn't this waste 2 bytes on all pages? Or just the head one with the headers?
On arches where NET_IP_ALIGN = 2, where it makes sense to get a proper
alignement, even for the copy of headers into skb->head, with same
source/destination alignment.
We 'waste' already 66 bytes for typical ethernet+IPv4+TCP headers.
Lets remind we allocate half a page (2048 bytes) for an ethernet frame
anyway. We have plenty of room.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists