lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <56AFA8D2.50500@hpe.com> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:49:54 -0800 From: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@....com> To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com Cc: jay.vosburgh@...onical.com, bjornar.ness@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org, vfalico@...il.com, gospo@...ulusnetworks.com, jiri@...nulli.us, mst@...hat.com, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org Subject: Re: bonding (IEEE 802.3ad) not working with qemu/virtio On 01/29/2016 10:59 PM, David Miller wrote: > There should be a default speed/duplex setting for such devices as well. > We can pick one that will be use universally for these kinds of devices. There is at least one monitoring tool - collectl - which gets a trifle upset when the actual speed through an interface is significantly greater than the reported link speed. I have to wonder how unique it is in that regard. Doesn't mean there can't be a default, but does suggest it should be rather high. rick jones
Powered by blists - more mailing lists