netdev - Re: [PATCH net 5/6] net: mvneta: The mvneta_percpu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 01 Feb 2016 11:22:45 +0100
From:	Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com, jason@...edaemon.net,
	andrew@...n.ch, sebastian.hesselbarth@...il.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, alior@...vell.com,
	nadavh@...vell.com, mw@...ihalf.com, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	w@....eu
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 5/6] net: mvneta: The mvneta_percpu_elect function should be atomic

Hi David,
 
 On sam., janv. 30 2016, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:

> From: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com>
> Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 17:26:06 +0100
>
>> @@ -370,6 +370,8 @@ struct mvneta_port {
>>  	struct net_device *dev;
>>  	struct notifier_block cpu_notifier;
>>  	int rxq_def;
>> +	/* protect  */
>> +	spinlock_t lock;
>>  
>>  	/* Core clock */
>>  	struct clk *clk;
>
> Protect what?  This comment needs a lot of improvement.

Sorry about it, this was a left-over.

>
> Everyone knows a spinlock "protects" things, so if you aren't going
> to actually describe what this lock protects, and in what contexts
> the lock is used, you might as well not say anything at all.

I can only agree with you, I will fix it for next version.

Thanks,

Gregory


-- 
Gregory Clement, Free Electrons
Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux
development, consulting, training and support.
http://free-electrons.com