netdev - Re: [PATCH net] nftables: use list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse to traversal commit_list in nf_tables

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160201110823.GA8361@salvia>
Date:	Mon, 1 Feb 2016 12:08:23 +0100
From:	Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@...filter.org>
To:	Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Cc:	network dev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org, davem <davem@...emloft.net>,
	fw@...len.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] nftables: use list_for_each_entry_safe_reverse to
 traversal commit_list in nf_tables_abort

On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 06:47:33PM +0800, Xin Long wrote:
> >
> > No need to resend.
> >
> > Yes, we need this reverse iteration there to handle the 'delete table'
> > command in the batch. This problem happens since we have
> > nft_flush_table().
> >
> > Other callsites are artificially restriction deletion of inactive
> > objects but that should be removed as we already discuss on the
> > mailing list.
> >
> > So I'm applying this, thanks.
> 
> Hi Pablo, has this one been applied ?

commit a907e36d54e0ff836e55e04531be201bf6b4d8c8
Author: Xin Long <lucien.xin@...il.com>
Date:   Mon Dec 7 18:48:07 2015 +0800

    netfilter: nf_tables: use reverse traversal commit_list in nf_tables_abort