[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1454464501.7627.210.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 17:55:01 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH net] ipv6: fix a lockdep splat
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Silence lockdep false positive about rcu_dereference() being
used in the wrong context.
First one should use rcu_dereference_protected() as we own the spinlock.
Second one should be a normal assignation, as no barrier is needed.
Fixes: 18367681a10bd ("ipv6 flowlabel: Convert np->ipv6_fl_list to RCU.")
Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
---
net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c | 5 +++--
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
index 1f9ebe3cbb4a..dc2db4f7b182 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c
@@ -540,12 +540,13 @@ int ipv6_flowlabel_opt(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval, int optlen)
}
spin_lock_bh(&ip6_sk_fl_lock);
for (sflp = &np->ipv6_fl_list;
- (sfl = rcu_dereference(*sflp)) != NULL;
+ (sfl = rcu_dereference_protected(*sflp,
+ lockdep_is_held(&ip6_sk_fl_lock))) != NULL;
sflp = &sfl->next) {
if (sfl->fl->label == freq.flr_label) {
if (freq.flr_label == (np->flow_label&IPV6_FLOWLABEL_MASK))
np->flow_label &= ~IPV6_FLOWLABEL_MASK;
- *sflp = rcu_dereference(sfl->next);
+ *sflp = sfl->next;
spin_unlock_bh(&ip6_sk_fl_lock);
fl_release(sfl->fl);
kfree_rcu(sfl, rcu);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists