lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <1454464501.7627.210.camel@edumazet-glaptop2.roam.corp.google.com> Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 17:55:01 -0800 From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> To: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH net] ipv6: fix a lockdep splat From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> Silence lockdep false positive about rcu_dereference() being used in the wrong context. First one should use rcu_dereference_protected() as we own the spinlock. Second one should be a normal assignation, as no barrier is needed. Fixes: 18367681a10bd ("ipv6 flowlabel: Convert np->ipv6_fl_list to RCU.") Reported-by: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com> --- net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c | 5 +++-- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c b/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c index 1f9ebe3cbb4a..dc2db4f7b182 100644 --- a/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c +++ b/net/ipv6/ip6_flowlabel.c @@ -540,12 +540,13 @@ int ipv6_flowlabel_opt(struct sock *sk, char __user *optval, int optlen) } spin_lock_bh(&ip6_sk_fl_lock); for (sflp = &np->ipv6_fl_list; - (sfl = rcu_dereference(*sflp)) != NULL; + (sfl = rcu_dereference_protected(*sflp, + lockdep_is_held(&ip6_sk_fl_lock))) != NULL; sflp = &sfl->next) { if (sfl->fl->label == freq.flr_label) { if (freq.flr_label == (np->flow_label&IPV6_FLOWLABEL_MASK)) np->flow_label &= ~IPV6_FLOWLABEL_MASK; - *sflp = rcu_dereference(sfl->next); + *sflp = sfl->next; spin_unlock_bh(&ip6_sk_fl_lock); fl_release(sfl->fl); kfree_rcu(sfl, rcu);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists