lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56B341EA.4020507@ti.com>
Date:	Thu, 4 Feb 2016 14:19:54 +0200
From:	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
To:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC:	"Franklin S Cooper Jr." <fcooper@...com>, <m-karicheri2@...com>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <w-kwok2@...com>, <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Santosh Shilimkar <ssantosh@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: Keystone 2 boards boot failure

Hi Arnd,

On 02/03/2016 10:40 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Wednesday 03 February 2016 18:31:00 Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>> On 02/03/2016 06:20 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 03 February 2016 16:21:05 Grygorii Strashko wrote:
>>>> On 02/03/2016 04:11 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
>>>>> On 02/02/2016 07:19 PM, Franklin S Cooper Jr. wrote:
>>>
>>> This looks wrong: I was getting the build warnings originally
>>> because of 64-bit dma_addr_t, and that should be the only way that
>>> this driver can operate, because in some configurations on keystone
>>> there is no memory below 4GB, and there is no dma-ranges property
>>> in the DT that shifts around the start of the DMA addresses.
>>
>> see keystone.dtsi:
>> 	soc {
>> 		#address-cells = <1>;
>> 		#size-cells = <1>;
>> 		compatible = "ti,keystone","simple-bus";
>> 		interrupt-parent = <&gic>;
>> 		ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x0 0xc0000000>;
>> 		dma-ranges = <0x80000000 0x8 0x00000000 0x80000000>;
>> 		^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> You are right, I totally missed it when I looked again. I thought it
> was correct but then couldn't find it in the dts.
> 
>> config:
>>
>> CONFIG_ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=y
>> CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT=y
>>
>> and
>>
>> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT <--- should not be defined for KS2
>> typedef u64 dma_addr_t;
>> #else
>> typedef u32 dma_addr_t;
>> #endif
>>
>> Above is valid configuration for Keystone 2 with LPAE=y
> 
> Ok, but what do you mean with "should not be defined"? It clearly is
> defined in any multiplatform configuration that enables another platform
> needing 64-bit dma_addr_t.
> 

Then we probably have bigger problem :) KS2 will not work as is with
such configuration and not only KS2 - LPAE is enabled for TI DRA7 also.

Problem here is that dma_addr_t is used to fill DMA controllers data or can be 
written directly to register, so all drivers need to be revised which was initially
created for 32-bit HW and with assumption that dma_addr_t is 32-bits.

Also, I'm not sure that it will be possible to support both LE/BE in such case.

Actually, I've tried current multi_v7_defconfig and can see:
# CONFIG_ARCH_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT is not set
# CONFIG_PHYS_ADDR_T_64BIT is not set
# CONFIG_ARM_LPAE is not set
What is your "multiplatform configuration" ??

So I propose to fix this regression first (as we both did - revert changes in 
get/set_pad_info()) and have KS2 working again with current version of
defconfig files (keystone_defconfig & multi_v7_defconfig) while this discussion is continuing. 

-- 
regards,
-grygorii

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ