netdev - Re: [V4.4-rc6 Regression] af_unix: Revert 'lock_interruptible' in stream receive code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87egcqsvoz.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>
Date:	Fri, 05 Feb 2016 21:18:04 +0000
From:	Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@...ileactivedefense.com>
To:	Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com>
Cc:	Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@...ileactivedefense.com>,
	hannes@...essinduktion.org,
	"davem\@davemloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>, edumazet@...gle.com,
	dhowells@...hat.com, ying.xue@...driver.com,
	"netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"stable\@vger.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [V4.4-rc6 Regression] af_unix: Revert 'lock_interruptible' in stream receive code

Joseph Salisbury <joseph.salisbury@...onical.com> writes:
> On 02/05/2016 02:59 PM, Rainer Weikusat wrote:

[recvmsg w/o iovecs returning ENOTSUP for CMSG requests]

>> Funny little problem :-). The code using the interruptible lock cleared
>> err as side effect hence the
>>
>> out:
>> 	return copied ? : err;
>>
>> at the end of unix_stream_read_generic didn't return the -ENOTSUP put
>> into err at the start of the function if copied was zero after the loop
>> because the size of the passed data buffer was zero.

There are more problems wrt handling control-message only reads in this
code. In particular, changing the test program as follows:

    if (fork() == 0) {
	sleep(1);
	send(socket_fd[client], msg, sizeof msg, MSG_DONTWAIT | MSG_NOSIGNAL);

	_exit(0);
    }

makes the recvmsg fail with EAGAIN and judging from the code (I didn't
test this yet), it will return without an error but also without
credentials if the

err = -EAGAIN
if (!timeo)
	break;

is changed to

if (!timeo) {
	err = -EAGAIN;
        break
}

because the following

mutex_lock(&u->readlock);
continue;

will cause the

do {
} while (size)

loop condition to be evaluated and since size is 0 (AIUI), the loop will
terminate immediately.