lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 07 Feb 2016 14:25:26 -0500 (EST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: brouer@...hat.com Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, cl@...ux.com, tom@...bertland.com, alexander.duyck@...il.com, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com, gerlitz.or@...il.com Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 00/11] net: mitigating kmem_cache slowpath and BoF discussion patches From: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com> Date: Tue, 02 Feb 2016 22:11:28 +0100 > This patchset is relevant for my NetDev 1.1 "Network Performance BoF" [1]. > > The first 4 patches, is a repost[2], for the first real use-case of > kmem_cache bulk alloc and free API. They were adjusted slightly to > accomodate my last slab API changes. They should be ready for > inclusion in net-next, as the needed MM tree are avail in net-next. > > Patch 5 is also enabling the SKB bulk API for mlx5. > > Thus, patches 1-5 should be ready for net-next. > > After patch 5, the experimental patches begin, which is Prove-of-Concept > code for what we will be discussing during the Network Performance BoF [1] > > [1] http://netdevconf.org/1.1/bof-network-performance-bof-jesper-dangaard-brouer.html > [2] http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.network/384302/ Very exciting work, indeed! Jesper, why don't you resubmit just the first three patches as a group? They seem a lot less controversial and as Alexei said, stand on their own. Thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists