netdev - Re: [PATCH 8/9] rfkill: Userspace control for airplane mode

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CA+A7VXVrbixa+DqiOfzuBkCTVy+f0GOTqiMqXs1sekXu1Q7ekQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 8 Feb 2016 12:22:32 -0500
From:	João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@...il.com>
To:	Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com>
Cc:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
	linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
	Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	linux@...lessm.com,
	João Paulo Rechi Vita <jprvita@...lessm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] rfkill: Userspace control for airplane mode

On 8 February 2016 at 11:11, Dan Williams <dcbw@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 10:41 -0500, João Paulo Rechi Vita wrote:
>> Provide an interface for the airplane-mode indicator be controlled
>> from
>> userspace. User has to first acquire the control through
>> RFKILL_OP_AIRPLANE_MODE_ACQUIRE and keep the fd open for the whole
>> time
>> it wants to be in control of the indicator. Closing the fd or using
>> RFKILL_OP_AIRPLANE_MODE_RELEASE restores the default policy.
>>
>> To change state of the indicator, the RFKILL_OP_AIRPLANE_MODE_CHANGE
>> operation is used, passing the value on "struct rfkill_event.soft".
>> If
>> the caller has not acquired the airplane-mode control beforehand, the
>> operation fails.
>
> I'd like to clarify a bit, so tell me if I'm correct or not.  Using
> RFKILL_OP_AIRPLANE_MODE_CHANGE does not actually change any device
> state. It's just an indicator with no relationship to any of the
> registered rfkill switches, right?
>

Yes, that's correct, and it is the intended behavior.

> I wonder if setting RFKILL_OP_AIRPLANE_MODE_CHANGE(true) shouldn't also
> softblock all switches, otherwise you can set airplane mode all day
> long with RFKILL_OP_AIRPLANE_MODE_CHANGE and it doesn't actually enable
> airplane mode at all?
>

The idea behind it is to just provide the mechanism for userspace to
decide what exactly being in airplane mode means, so it would
set/unset the indicator in the right moment.

--
João Paulo Rechi Vita
http://about.me/jprvita