netdev - Re: [PATCH v3] net: ethernet: support "fixed-link" DT node on nb8800 driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <56B8A86D.7060403@laposte.net>
Date:	Mon, 08 Feb 2016 15:38:37 +0100
From:	Sebastian Frias <sf84@...oste.net>
To:	Mason <slash.tmp@...e.fr>, Mans Rullgard <mans@...sr.com>
CC:	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] net: ethernet: support "fixed-link" DT node on nb8800
 driver

On 02/08/2016 03:11 PM, Mason wrote:
> On 08/02/2016 14:37, Måns Rullgård wrote:
>
>> Sebastian Frias wrote:
>>
>>> By the way, I know some people like the command line, email, etc. but
>>> there ought to be other tools better suited for patch review...
>>
>> Some kernel subsystems use http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/ to track status
>> of various patches.
>
> There's also a kernel bugzilla, but it may be for actual bugs.
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/
>

Thanks, and what would be the definition of a bug?
I mean, would the issue from this thread qualify?
Should I have created a bug report before submitting the patch?