netdev - Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [next] igb: allow setting MAC address on i211 using a device tree blob

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20160210165925.GA9492@lunn.ch>
Date:	Wed, 10 Feb 2016 17:59:25 +0100
From:	Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:	John Holland <jotihojr@...il.com>
Cc:	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [next] igb: allow setting MAC address on i211
 using a device tree blob

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 10:13:56AM +0100, John Holland wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 9, 2016, at 12:54, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch> wrote:
> 
> >>> +static void igb_read_mac_addr_dts(struct e1000_hw *hw)
> >>> +{
> >>> +       const u8 *mac;
> >>> +       struct device_node *dn;
> >>> +
> >>> +       dn = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "intel,i211");
> > 
> > Hi John
> > 
> > Would this also work for the i210?
> 

> The usability scenario of i210 and i211 seem similar
> enough. Although, I will not be able to test the i210, I will use it
> as the compatible keyword.

I can test on i210.

  Andrew