[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56BBB558.3010205@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2016 14:10:32 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Stefan Agner <stefan@...er.ch>, david.choi@...rel.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Micrel PHY and power down mode
Hi Stefan,
On 10/02/16 11:25, Stefan Agner wrote:
> Hi David, Hi Florian,
>
> We use a Micrel KSZ8041NL and we observe sometimes continuous RX errors
> (PHY's RXER counter is continuously incrementing, activity LED blinks
> and no communication is possible). It seems that only some PHY's are
> affected (3-4%) and only in certain temperature ranges (the PHY I can
> reproduce the issue here shows the problem ~30°C). We could narrow the
> issue down, and realized that the problem only appears after the PHY has
> been in power down mode. Since Linux calls suspend/resume when
> attaching/detaching the PHY, a simple ifup/ifdown bascially can trigger
> the issue.
>
> Currently, the wakeup sequence writes the following registers
> 0x8000 to 0x00 (phy_attach_direct -> phy_init_hw -> genphy_soft_reset)
> 0x3000 to 0x00 (phy_attach_direct -> genphy_resume)
>
> I am not sure if this sequence is really ok. It seems to me that
> genphy_soft_reset clears the power down bit already, which makes
> genphy_resume somewhat useless. However, altering the behavior of
> genphy_soft_reset to not clear the power down bit (yet) did not resolve
> the issue.
AFAIR, issuing a BMCR reset, with a PHY which was in power down should
clear the power down bit, but I would not be surprised if some PHYs were
not quite behaving like that though.
>
> Is clearing the power down bit and generating the reset in one go
> intended? I checked the datasheet, and did not found particular
> information about the "resume" sequence...
Does it help if your PHY resume callback does the same thing as what the
config_init() does? You have the ability to skip the generic software
reset of the PHY via BMCR bit 15, and instead do nothing by implementing
your own soft_reset() callback, that might tell you whether the software
reset is what is screwing things up?
Getting some insight from somebody at Micrel would definitively help
with understanding what a workaround or fix would look like.
HTH
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists