[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160211.115614.1923342260282122052.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 11:56:14 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: razor@...ckwall.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] virtio_net: better ethtool setting
validation
From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <razor@...ckwall.org>
Date: Sun, 7 Feb 2016 21:52:22 +0100
> This small set is a follow-up for the recent patches that added ethtool
> get/set settings. Patch 1 changes the speed validation routine to check
> if the speed is between 0 and INT_MAX (or SPEED_UNKNOWN) and patch 2 adds
> port validation to virtio_net and better validation comment.
>
> This set is on top of Michael's patch which explains that speeds from 0
> to INT_MAX are valid:
> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/578911/
Series applied, thanks.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists