[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160211.042750.376596563683727607.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 04:27:50 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: johannes@...solutions.net
Cc: linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org, ja@....bg,
johannes.berg@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] ipv4: add option to drop unicast encapsulated
in L2 multicast
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2016 13:31:17 +0100
> From: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
>
> In order to solve a problem with 802.11, the so-called hole-196 attack,
> add an option (sysctl) called "drop_unicast_in_l2_multicast" which, if
> enabled, causes the stack to drop IPv4 unicast packets encapsulated in
> link-layer multi- or broadcast frames. Such frames can (as an attack)
> be created by any member of the same wireless network and transmitted
> as valid encrypted frames since the symmetric key for broadcast frames
> is shared between all stations.
>
> Additionally, enabling this option provides compliance with a SHOULD
> clause of RFC 1122.
>
> Reviewed-by: Julian Anastasov <ja@....bg>
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>
Applied.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists