lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 06:12:50 -0500 (EST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: asd@...ian1000.go.ro Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH net v4] r8169: Bad implementation of netif_carrier_* From: Corcodel Marian <asd@...ian1000.go.ro> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 12:52:49 +0200 > On Thu, 2016-02-11 at 03:39 -0500, David Miller wrote: >> From: Corcodel Marian <asd@...ian1000.go.ro> >> Date: Thu, 11 Feb 2016 08:27:43 +0200 >> >> > On probe stage what carrier to stop and rest two situation >> > netif_carrier_* is slow and disturbing autonegociation process. >> > >> > Signed-off-by: Corcodel Marian <asd@...ian1000.go.ro> >> >> This doesn't tell us at all why your change is valid. You aren't >> going into the details of what you mean by "disturbing" and why it >> being "slow" is really a problem. >> >> In general, your patches are of a very low quality. You give never >> give us enough information to properly evaluate your patch. >> >> It is unlikely that even one of your patches will be applied by >> me until you fix this fundamental problem with your submissions. > > May bee netif_carrier_* is good on slow changes of link good status of > interrupt ,is unable to keep track changes from link good interrupt. You're still not telling us anything. The situation with your submissions is not improving. Sorry.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists