[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56BD23E0.1090403@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2016 01:14:24 +0100
From: Lino Sanfilippo <LinoSanfilippo@....de>
To: Bryan.Whitehead@...rochip.com, davem@...emloft.net
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next,V2] Add LAN9352 Ethernet Driver
Hi,
> +static int mchp9352_open(struct net_device *dev)
> +{
> +
> + MCHP_TRACE(pdata, ifup, "Testing irq handler using IRQ %d", dev->irq);
> + pdata->software_irq_signal = 0;
> +
> + /* Testing irq handler */
> + smp_wmb();
Should not there at least be a matching smp_rmb() in the irq handler?
Maybe an atomic_t would be a better choice for a flag like
software_irq_signal here.
> +
> +static int mchp9352_drv_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> +
> + netif_carrier_off(dev);
> +
> + retval = register_netdev(dev);
> + if (retval) {
> + MCHP_WARN(pdata, probe, "Error %i registering device", retval);
> + goto out_free_irq;
> + } else {
> + MCHP_TRACE(pdata, probe,
> + "Network interface: \"%s\"", dev->name);
> + }
Note that as soon as the network device is registered "open" may be
called so everything should be set up already. In this case the mac
address (dev->dev_addr) is accessed in open but may not yet contain
valid data when register_netdev is called.
Regards,
Lino
Powered by blists - more mailing lists