[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACT4Y+bKiens=uiZ99t+9ThtXi33W_bQLqh_AgWkQeQDmyUE5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Feb 2016 16:11:22 +0100
From: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To: Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
linux-sctp@...r.kernel.org,
Vladislav Yasevich <vyasevich@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: sctp: bad hash index calculation
Hello,
While looking into some memory leaks of sctp ports I've noticed that
sctp_init initializes port hash table as follows:
/* Allocate and initialize the SCTP port hash table. */
do {
sctp_port_hashsize = (1UL << order) * PAGE_SIZE /
sizeof(struct sctp_bind_hashbucket);
if ((sctp_port_hashsize > (64 * 1024)) && order > 0)
continue;
sctp_port_hashtable = (struct sctp_bind_hashbucket *)
__get_free_pages(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NOWARN, order);
} while (!sctp_port_hashtable && --order > 0);
and then hash index is computed as follows:
/* Warning: The following hash functions assume a power of two 'size'. */
/* This is the hash function for the SCTP port hash table. */
static inline int sctp_phashfn(struct net *net, __u16 lport)
{
return (net_hash_mix(net) + lport) & (sctp_port_hashsize - 1);
}
I don't see what ensures that sctp_port_hashsize is in fact a power-of-2.
spinlock_t in sctp_bind_hashbucket can be 2 words in some configs,
then sizeof(sctp_bind_hashbucket) == 24, which can render half of hash
table unused.
struct sctp_bind_hashbucket {
spinlock_t lock;
struct hlist_head chain;
};
Am I missing something?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists