netdev - RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next V2 5/6] e1000: call ndo_stop() instead of dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Feb 2016 20:02:09 +0000
From:	"Brown, Aaron F" <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
To:	"Rustad, Mark D" <mark.d.rustad@...el.com>,
	Stefan Assmann <sassmann@...nic.de>
CC:	"intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org" <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: RE: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next V2 5/6] e1000: call
 ndo_stop()	instead of dev_close() when running offline selftest

> From: Rustad, Mark D
> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 9:23 AM
> To: Stefan Assmann
> Cc: intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org; netdev@...r.kernel.org; davem@...emloft.net; Brown, Aaron F
> Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] [PATCH net-next V2 5/6] e1000: call ndo_stop()   instead of dev_close() when running offline selftest
> 
> > Checkpatch warns that externs should be avoided in .c files, but they
> > pre-existed and are just being flagged due to the name changing, so...
> >
> > Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@...el.com>
> 
> Actually, it is the forward declarations in the .c that should be deleted.
> The prototypes should only exist in the .h file.

Thanks Mark,  I completely missed that the patch added it to both files, too busy reviving older hardware to extend to run the diags against a larger set of parts I guess :")