netdev - RE: [PATCH net-next,V2] Add LAN9352 Ethernet Driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <90A7E81AE28BAE4CBDDB3B35F187D264402EFB92@CHN-SV-EXMX02.mchp-main.com>
Date:	Tue, 16 Feb 2016 21:37:40 +0000
From:	<Bryan.Whitehead@...rochip.com>
To:	<andrew@...n.ch>
CC:	<davem@...emloft.net>, <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next,V2] Add LAN9352 Ethernet Driver

> From: Andrew Lunn [mailto:andrew@...n.ch]
> Sent: Tuesday, February 16, 2016 3:58 PM 
> > I believe I can make the physical phys accessible through ethertool.
> > Would that be reasonable?
> 
> How, you have no netdev to attach them to?
> 
> There was a nice presentation at netdev last week by Mellanox about their
> switches. I don't know if the video is available yet, but that shows the correct
> way to do this.
> 

You are right. I misunderstood how ethtool works.

Again, I'd like to change our target device to LAN9250, which is just an Ethernet controller with no switch. 

Will a driver for that device be more easily accepted?