[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160216030412.GA18469@vergenet.net>
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2016 12:04:15 +0900
From: Simon Horman <simon.horman@...ronome.com>
To: Alan <gnomes@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2] af_llc: fix types on llc_ui_wait_for_conn
On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 07:41:51PM +0000, Alan wrote:
> The timeout is a long, we return it truncated if it is huge. Basically
> harmless as the only caller does a boolean check, but tidy it up anyway.
If the only caller performs a boolean check then perhaps
it would be best if the function's return type was bool.
> (64bit build tested this time. Thank you 0day)
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> net/llc/af_llc.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/llc/af_llc.c b/net/llc/af_llc.c
> index 8dab4e5..b3c52e3 100644
> --- a/net/llc/af_llc.c
> +++ b/net/llc/af_llc.c
> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static u16 llc_ui_sap_link_no_max[256];
> static struct sockaddr_llc llc_ui_addrnull;
> static const struct proto_ops llc_ui_ops;
>
> -static int llc_ui_wait_for_conn(struct sock *sk, long timeout);
> +static long llc_ui_wait_for_conn(struct sock *sk, long timeout);
> static int llc_ui_wait_for_disc(struct sock *sk, long timeout);
> static int llc_ui_wait_for_busy_core(struct sock *sk, long timeout);
>
> @@ -551,7 +551,7 @@ static int llc_ui_wait_for_disc(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
> return rc;
> }
>
> -static int llc_ui_wait_for_conn(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
> +static long llc_ui_wait_for_conn(struct sock *sk, long timeout)
> {
> DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
>
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists