[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <56C44944.20803@mellanox.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 2016 12:19:48 +0200
From: Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
To: Rick Jones <rick.jones2@....com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>,
"Yishai Hadas" <yishaih@...lanox.com>, Amir Vadai <amir@...ai.me>,
Eugenia Emantayev <eugenia@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 1/6] net/mlx4_en: Do not count dropped packets twice
On 2/16/2016 8:31 PM, Rick Jones wrote:
>
> I'm still not clear on when an Acked-by is appropriate, but given that
> this has been a non-trivial frustration for a long time, a hearty
> endorsement from me. Perhaps not important enough but it would be
> nice to have it flow back a release or two.
sure, will ask stable inclusion as well
>
> That said, should mlx4_en_stats->RdropOvflw still be going into both
> rx_fifo_errors and rx_over_errors?
>
> stats->rx_over_errors = be32_to_cpu(mlx4_en_stats->RdropOvflw);
> stats->rx_crc_errors = be32_to_cpu(mlx4_en_stats->RCRC);
> stats->rx_frame_errors = 0;
> stats->rx_fifo_errors = be32_to_cpu(mlx4_en_stats->RdropOvflw);
yep, point taken, we will leave it only for the over ones, thanks for
pointing this out
Or.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists