lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9235D6609DB808459E95D78E17F2E43D404B3871@CHN-SV-EXMX02.mchp-main.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Feb 2016 00:03:50 +0000
From:	<Woojung.Huh@...rochip.com>
To:	<ben@...adent.org.uk>, <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH V2 net-next 2/3] lan78xx: add ethtool set & get pause
 functions

> > Add ethtool operations of set_pauseram and get_pauseparm.
> [...]
> > +static void lan78xx_get_pause(struct net_device *net,
> > +			      struct ethtool_pauseparam *pause)
> > +{
> > +	struct lan78xx_net *dev = netdev_priv(net);
> > +	struct phy_device *phydev = net->phydev;
> > +	struct ethtool_cmd ecmd = { .cmd = ETHTOOL_GSET };
> > +
> > +	phy_ethtool_gset(phydev, &ecmd);
> > +
> > +	pause->autoneg = dev->fc_autoneg;
> > +
> > +	if (dev->fc_autoneg) {
> > +		if (dev->fc_autoneg_control & FLOW_CTRL_TX)
> > +			pause->tx_pause = 1;
> > +
> > +		if (dev->fc_autoneg_control & FLOW_CTRL_RX)
> > +			pause->rx_pause = 1;
> 
> This is incorrect; you should always return the manual settings
> (fc_request_control flags) here.  If autonegotiation is enabled then
> your get_settings function will return the actual pause flags.
> 
> Ben.

Ben, thanks for comments.
How about comment in include/uapi/linux/ethtool.h?
It says 
** struct ethtool_pauseparam - Ethernet pause (flow control) parameters
...
* If @autoneg is non-zero, the MAC is configured to send and/or
* receive pause frames according to the result of autonegotiation.

Doesn't this mean get_pauseparam() returns pause settings based on 
Result of autonegotation? Not manual settings of rx_param & tx_param?

Woojung

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ