[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20160219.111423.805323521899765528.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 11:14:23 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: machida.yuki@...fujitsu.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, hideaki.yoshifuji@...aclelinux.com,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, liuhangbin@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH stable v2 1/1] net/ipv6: add sysctl option
accept_ra_min_hop_limit
From: Yuki Machida <machida.yuki@...fujitsu.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 17:49:58 +0900
> ping? thanks.
If your patch is properly queued in patchwork, you never need to do
pings on the mailing list like this.
Someone knows the patch need to be dealt with, and if it is not being
reviewed it simply means that other patches are other older or have
a much higher priority than your's.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists