netdev - RE: [net-next 10/16] i40e: add check for null VSI

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 19 Feb 2016 19:51:39 +0000
From:	"Underwood, JohnX" <johnx.underwood@...el.com>
To:	"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"nhorman@...hat.com" <nhorman@...hat.com>,
	"sassmann@...hat.com" <sassmann@...hat.com>,
	"jogreene@...hat.com" <jogreene@...hat.com>
Subject: RE: [net-next 10/16] i40e: add check for null VSI

Sorry, folks.  I was confused.  The patch looked familiar, but I wasn't able to find the email where I originally sent it out.

-----Original Message-----
From: Kirsher, Jeffrey T 
Sent: Friday, February 19, 2016 11:49 AM
To: David Miller; Underwood, JohnX
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; nhorman@...hat.com; sassmann@...hat.com; jogreene@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 10/16] i40e: add check for null VSI

On Fri, 2016-02-19 at 14:41 -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Underwood, JohnX" <johnx.underwood@...el.com>
> Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 19:15:53 +0000
> 
> > ACK
> 
> You should never top-post on this mailing list.
> 
> But in this specific case it is even more important.
> 
> So just in case it is not clear:
> 
>         Please, pretty please, DO NOT top-post ACKs to patches like 
> this.
> 
> It looks like a new, fresh, patch submission to patchwork therefore 
> you are creating a significant burdon for me.

Not to mention he was ACK'ing his own patch that he authored. :-(

Sorry Dave, I will work with him offline.