| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <e3080bbbd37524fbc121edbeb68bb6cbfbae393d.1455899111.git.daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 23:05:22 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/6] bpf: add new arg_type that allows for 0 sized stack buffer
Currently, when we pass a buffer from the eBPF stack into a helper
function, the function proto indicates argument types as ARG_PTR_TO_STACK
and ARG_CONST_STACK_SIZE pair. If R<X> contains the former, then R<X+1>
must be of the latter type. Then, verifier checks whether the buffer
points into eBPF stack, is initialized, etc. The verifier also guarantees
that the constant value passed in R<X+1> is greater than 0, so helper
functions don't need to test for it and can always assume a non-NULL
initialized buffer as well as non-0 buffer size.
This patch adds a new argument types ARG_CONST_STACK_SIZE_OR_ZERO that
allows to also pass NULL as R<X> and 0 as R<X+1> into the helper function.
Such helper functions, of course, need to be able to handle these cases
internally then. Verifier guarantees that either R<X> == NULL && R<X+1> == 0
or R<X> != NULL && R<X+1> != 0 (like the case of ARG_CONST_STACK_SIZE), any
other combinations are not possible to load.
I went through various options of extending the verifier, and introducing
the type ARG_CONST_STACK_SIZE_OR_ZERO seems to have most minimal changes
needed to the verifier.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
---
include/linux/bpf.h | 1 +
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
2 files changed, 33 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/bpf.h b/include/linux/bpf.h
index 0cadbb7..51e498e 100644
--- a/include/linux/bpf.h
+++ b/include/linux/bpf.h
@@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ enum bpf_arg_type {
*/
ARG_PTR_TO_STACK, /* any pointer to eBPF program stack */
ARG_CONST_STACK_SIZE, /* number of bytes accessed from stack */
+ ARG_CONST_STACK_SIZE_OR_ZERO, /* number of bytes accessed from stack or 0 */
ARG_PTR_TO_CTX, /* pointer to context */
ARG_ANYTHING, /* any (initialized) argument is ok */
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 42ba4cc..36dc497 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -779,15 +779,24 @@ static int check_xadd(struct verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn)
* bytes from that pointer, make sure that it's within stack boundary
* and all elements of stack are initialized
*/
-static int check_stack_boundary(struct verifier_env *env,
- int regno, int access_size)
+static int check_stack_boundary(struct verifier_env *env, int regno,
+ int access_size, bool zero_size_allowed)
{
struct verifier_state *state = &env->cur_state;
struct reg_state *regs = state->regs;
int off, i;
- if (regs[regno].type != PTR_TO_STACK)
+ if (regs[regno].type != PTR_TO_STACK) {
+ if (zero_size_allowed && access_size == 0 &&
+ regs[regno].type == CONST_IMM &&
+ regs[regno].imm == 0)
+ return 0;
+
+ verbose("R%d type=%s expected=%s\n", regno,
+ reg_type_str[regs[regno].type],
+ reg_type_str[PTR_TO_STACK]);
return -EACCES;
+ }
off = regs[regno].imm;
if (off >= 0 || off < -MAX_BPF_STACK || off + access_size > 0 ||
@@ -830,15 +839,24 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
return 0;
}
- if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_STACK || arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_KEY ||
+ if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_KEY ||
arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE) {
expected_type = PTR_TO_STACK;
- } else if (arg_type == ARG_CONST_STACK_SIZE) {
+ } else if (arg_type == ARG_CONST_STACK_SIZE ||
+ arg_type == ARG_CONST_STACK_SIZE_OR_ZERO) {
expected_type = CONST_IMM;
} else if (arg_type == ARG_CONST_MAP_PTR) {
expected_type = CONST_PTR_TO_MAP;
} else if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_CTX) {
expected_type = PTR_TO_CTX;
+ } else if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_STACK) {
+ expected_type = PTR_TO_STACK;
+ /* One exception here. In case function allows for NULL to be
+ * passed in as argument, it's a CONST_IMM type. Final test
+ * happens during stack boundary checking.
+ */
+ if (reg->type == CONST_IMM && reg->imm == 0)
+ expected_type = CONST_IMM;
} else {
verbose("unsupported arg_type %d\n", arg_type);
return -EFAULT;
@@ -868,8 +886,8 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
verbose("invalid map_ptr to access map->key\n");
return -EACCES;
}
- err = check_stack_boundary(env, regno, (*mapp)->key_size);
-
+ err = check_stack_boundary(env, regno, (*mapp)->key_size,
+ false);
} else if (arg_type == ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE) {
/* bpf_map_xxx(..., map_ptr, ..., value) call:
* check [value, value + map->value_size) validity
@@ -879,9 +897,12 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
verbose("invalid map_ptr to access map->value\n");
return -EACCES;
}
- err = check_stack_boundary(env, regno, (*mapp)->value_size);
+ err = check_stack_boundary(env, regno, (*mapp)->value_size,
+ false);
+ } else if (arg_type == ARG_CONST_STACK_SIZE ||
+ arg_type == ARG_CONST_STACK_SIZE_OR_ZERO) {
+ bool zero_size_allowed = (arg_type == ARG_CONST_STACK_SIZE_OR_ZERO);
- } else if (arg_type == ARG_CONST_STACK_SIZE) {
/* bpf_xxx(..., buf, len) call will access 'len' bytes
* from stack pointer 'buf'. Check it
* note: regno == len, regno - 1 == buf
@@ -891,7 +912,8 @@ static int check_func_arg(struct verifier_env *env, u32 regno,
verbose("ARG_CONST_STACK_SIZE cannot be first argument\n");
return -EACCES;
}
- err = check_stack_boundary(env, regno - 1, reg->imm);
+ err = check_stack_boundary(env, regno - 1, reg->imm,
+ zero_size_allowed);
}
return err;
--
1.9.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists