[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160221120525.24769852@xeon-e3>
Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 12:05:25 -0800
From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
To: Marcus Furlong <furlongm@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: iproute2 query
On Fri, 19 Feb 2016 20:12:04 +1100
Marcus Furlong <furlongm@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just wondering if the following command should work:
>
> # ip route add 192.168.27.27/24 dev eth0 scope link src 192.168.27.27
> RTNETLINK answers: Invalid argument
>
> However, this command works:
>
> # ip route add 192.168.27.0/24 dev eth0 scope link src 192.168.27.27
>
> 192.168.27.0/24 and 192.168.27.27/24 describe the same subnet?
>
> Regards,
> Marcus.
>
It is the kernel complaining, not ip command.
The kernel will not accept 192.168.27.27/24 as route since it is a full
network address, not an network prefix.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists