netdev - Re: [net-next PATCH 0/2] GENEVE/VXLAN: Enable outer Tx checksum by default

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CALx6S34_HnMqftJ7hUTzQChsA=Hi9RzkNTr=GJ4bNnyNUsaA6g@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Feb 2016 10:32:32 -0800
From:	Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:	Jesse Gross <jesse@...nel.org>, Edward Cree <ecree@...arflare.com>,
	Alex Duyck <aduyck@...antis.com>,
	Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alexander Duyck <alexander.duyck@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH 0/2] GENEVE/VXLAN: Enable outer Tx checksum by default

On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 10:26 AM, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> wrote:
> From: Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>
> Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 09:42:00 -0800
>
>> Why not just fix the stack to conform to RFC6864? As Edward pointed
>> out we lose the actual IP ID's in GRO anyway, so attempts to set them
>> in GSO may be wildly incorrect from the source point of view-- even in
>> that case were probably better off changing the IP identifier to zero
>> (okay since we're already breaking the E2E model anyway :-) ).
>
> Tom, you can't, you'll break TCP header compression schemes which
> expect a monotonically increasing IP ID value.
>
> We tried setting the IP ID to zero for frames with DF set, it broke
> things.

All the more reason to move to IPv6 ;-)