[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20160223202901.GC4941@oracle.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:29:01 -0500
From: Sowmini Varadhan <sowmini.varadhan@...cle.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: mroos@...ux.ee, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, edumazet@...gle.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Invalid sk_policy[] access
On (02/23/16 15:20), David Miller wrote:
> Indeed, the kernel is 64-bit in both cases.
> And the userland bit-arity has no relevance whatsoever for this bug.
hang on; The sizeof (and offsetof) values I listed were obtained either
from /usr/bin/crash (on the T5) or from simple printk's of the structures
in the case of the v440. And they *are* different, and the numbers
match the values dumped on the console on pnaic. So isnt there actually
a problem here?
--Sowmini
Powered by blists - more mailing lists